Research Misconduct (Scratchpad)
This page is a personal scratchpad.
FFP: fabrication / falsification / plagiarism
RCR: responsible conduct of research
questionable research practices (QRPs)
- integrity
- honesty
- Research integrity means behaving with integrity when undertaking research activities
- impartiality
- plagiarism
- solemn
- honest error
- The responsibilities of them do not end there.
- abet (v)
- Generally speaking, the term “research institution” might conjure up images of a national research institution.
- MEXT has put together guidelines designed primarily for the universities and research institutions under its jurisdiction.
- honest error
- “Do no harm” is the most fundamental ethical precept.
- If a researcher sullies their reputation by engaging in misconduct, it can also shake the credibility of them.
- They imposed a punitive dismissal on the grounds that they had “damaged the university’s honor and credit.”
- This researcher had already submitted to the institution a notice of withdrawal.
- But it sent him a letter strongly deploring his conduct.
- They may come under public scrutiny.
- vanity in wanting to make one's achievements look good.
- In particular, it is conceivable that ...
- there is little movement of personnel between departments.
- In psychology, this is called the normalization of deviance.
- people placed in a quandary by interpersonal relationships
- We must be keenly aware that not only self-legitimation.
- self-deprocation
- legitimacy of the author's interpretation
- Being proud of the organization to which one belongs is a good thing in itself.
- It is said that misconduct is more likely to occur in a person-oriented organizational climate.
- the data obtained through research also has a bearing on copyright.
- stipulate
- penalties for infridgements
- You must abide by decisions.
- It is vital that the following requirements are met.
- inadvertent modification of data
- advervent = 不注意
- The most serious ethical breaches
- a researcher holds a pecuniary interest
- There are legal precedents stating that
- it is not subject to injunctions, nor does consent need to be obtained or remuneration paid for it
- employee invention provisions governing inventions devised by employees
- However, agreements concerning the attribution of data in the case of the university’s researchers differ from those applicable in the case of university exectives.
- faculty members
- prefectural and municipal ordinances on access to information.
- litigations
- concerning affairs pertaining to contracts
- enshrined in law
- making an oath
- Thus, the professional rules governing engineering research deem the falsification.
- They cannot avoid their reputation as a co-author being tarnished
- disseminate information
- 5% equity interest
- paying them substantial remuneration
- The individuals concerned must do their utmost to discuss the issue frankly